4 min read Deep Dive

ARM (ARM) Licensing vs Royalties Business Model Deep Dive

ARM (ARM) Licensing vs Royalties Business Model Deep Dive

Understanding a company's core operations is fundamental to sound stock analysis. For ARM Holdings (ARM), this means a deep dive into its distinctive arm (arm) licensing vs royalties business model. This framework, championed by investors like Charlie Munger for its compounding power, underpins ARM's position in the global semiconductor industry. We will explore how this model works, its competitive advantages, key drivers, potential risks, and how to approach its valuation.

Understanding ARM's Business Model: Licensing vs. Royalties

ARM does not manufacture chips. Instead, it designs the foundational architecture for microprocessors. Its revenue streams are primarily split into two powerful components:

1. Licensing

  • What it is: Companies pay an upfront fee to license ARM's intellectual property (IP). This grants them the right to use ARM's processor designs (e.g., Cortex-A, Cortex-M) to create their own custom chips.
  • Why it matters: Licensing provides immediate revenue. It allows chip designers to leverage ARM's proven, power-efficient designs without starting from scratch. This accelerates their time to market and reduces R&D costs.
  • Growth driver: As more complex and specialised chips are needed across various industries, the demand for advanced ARM architectures increases, driving licensing revenue.

2. Royalties

  • What it is: After licensing, ARM receives a recurring royalty payment for every chip shipped by its licensees that incorporates ARM technology. This is typically a small percentage of the chip's average selling price.
  • Why it matters: Royalties represent a high-margin, scalable revenue stream. Once an architecture is licensed, ARM earns revenue passively as chips are produced and sold globally. This creates a powerful compounding effect.
  • Growth driver: The sheer volume of ARM-based chips shipped annually (billions) ensures a vast royalty base. Furthermore, newer, more advanced architectures (like ARMv9) often command higher royalty rates, boosting revenue per chip.

The synergy between licensing and royalties is ARM's strategic advantage. Licensing establishes the design, and royalties provide the long-term, high-margin payoff as those designs proliferate across devices worldwide.

The Enduring Moat: Why ARM is Hard to Displace

A strong competitive moat protects a company's profits. ARM possesses several:

  • Network Effects: ARM's architecture is ubiquitous. Billions of devices run on ARM. This has fostered a massive software ecosystem, with developers optimising for ARM. This makes it incredibly difficult for competitors to gain traction, as they lack the software support.
  • Switching Costs: For chip designers, moving away from ARM means significant re-tooling, re-designing, and re-optimising software. This is a costly and time-consuming endeavour, creating high switching costs.
  • Intellectual Property (IP) and Brand: ARM has decades of R&D invested in its power-efficient designs. Its brand is synonymous with mobile computing and increasingly, other high-growth areas.
  • Technological Leadership: ARM consistently innovates, offering increasingly powerful and efficient architectures that meet evolving industry demands.

Key Drivers for Growth

Several trends underpin ARM's future growth:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML): AI workloads are moving to the edge, requiring efficient processing in devices. ARM's power-efficient designs are ideal for this.
  • Internet of Things (IoT): The proliferation of connected devices, from smart home gadgets to industrial sensors, creates a vast market for ARM's low-power processors.
  • Data Centres and Cloud Computing: ARM-based server chips are gaining traction due to their efficiency, challenging traditional x86 dominance.
  • Automotive: Modern vehicles are becoming 'computers on wheels', demanding more sophisticated and numerous chips for infotainment, ADAS (Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems), and autonomous driving.
  • Increased Chip Complexity and Content: As devices become smarter, they require more powerful and specialised chips, often leading to higher royalty rates per device.

Significant Risks to Consider

No investment is without risk. For ARM, these include:

  • Competition: While ARM dominates, alternatives like RISC-V (an open-source instruction set architecture) pose a long-term threat. x86 (Intel, AMD) remains a competitor in certain segments.
  • Geopolitical Tensions: The global semiconductor supply chain is sensitive to international relations, particularly between the US and China.
  • Economic Downturns: A slowdown in consumer spending or enterprise investment can impact chip demand, affecting both licensing and royalty revenues.
  • Licensee Independence: Large licensees could theoretically develop their own proprietary architectures, though the switching costs are high.

Valuing ARM: A Framework

Valuing a high-growth, IP-centric company like ARM requires careful consideration. Two primary methods are often employed:

1. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

A DCF model estimates a company's intrinsic value by projecting its future free cash flows and discounting them back to the present. This is crucial for growth companies where future earnings are expected to be significantly higher than current ones.

  • Key Inputs: Critical inputs include revenue growth rates, operating margins, capital expenditures, and the discount rate. The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is typically used as the discount rate, reflecting the cost of both equity and debt.
  • Terminal Value: A significant portion of a growth company's value often comes from its terminal value, which represents the value of all cash flows beyond the explicit forecast period.
  • Screenwich DCF Calculator: You can explore a detailed DCF analysis for ARM, including its calculated fair value, on Screenwich's valuation tab. This provides a robust DCF calculator to adjust assumptions and see the impact on intrinsic value.

2. Comparable Company Analysis (CCA)

This method compares ARM's valuation multiples (e.g., Price-to-Earnings, Enterprise Value-to-Sales) to those of similar publicly traded companies. However, ARM's unique licensing and royalty model makes direct comparisons challenging, as few companies operate with such a pure-play IP model in semiconductors.

Assessing Valuation Uncertainty with Monte Carlo Simulation

Given the inherent uncertainties in forecasting, a Monte Carlo simulation is invaluable. This technique runs thousands of possible scenarios by varying key DCF inputs within a defined range. It provides a probability distribution of potential fair values, offering a more realistic view of valuation risk.

  • Screenwich Monte Carlo: Screenwich offers a Monte Carlo simulation for ARM, allowing you to visualise the range of potential outcomes and understand the sensitivity of the valuation to different assumptions.

Accessing Specifics and Staying Informed

For the most current data, financial statements, and analyst estimates for ARM, visit its dedicated page on Screenwich. Here you can find detailed financial metrics, historical performance, and the latest valuation insights. To track upcoming announcements and earnings reports, consult the earnings calendar. Diligent research, combining qualitative understanding of the business model with quantitative valuation tools, is key to informed investment decisions.

Screenwich